[LamaOfRuin]

From the post: "The CRAPL says nothing about copyright ownership or permission to commercialize. You'll have to attach another license if you want to classically open source your software."

It is explicitly the point of the license that the code is not for those purposes, because it's shitty code that should not be reused in any real code base.

[kragen]

That's not a good excuse for putting your readers at legal risk of copyright infringement. A real, non-shitty code base could easily be a "derivative work" of the shitty code.