|
|
|
|
|
|
by realce
1617 days ago
|
|
|
My wording is imprecise. You're right, what I suppose I meant to say was a standing centralized military. Those powers are to originally allow the funding of armies that are later disbanded, this attitude is also reflected in the 2nd amendment support of militias. Navy was a different consideration at the time since it protects trade, which is required for commerce afaik. |
|
|