|
|
|
|
|
by snkline
1616 days ago
|
|
There are other usages of we for an individual. I think the writer is trying to use what is called the editorial we, not the royal we. I will say it's use in that article is rather jarring however. edit: Looking it up, it appear this has a fancy name, encompassing the royal we, the editorial we, and more: Nosism. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nosism |
|