|
|
|
|
|
by chillacy
1615 days ago
|
|
This article makes a lot of pretty bold claims (not only pointing out a flaw but suggesting that there is a better alternative) without posting their own AI's image recognition results based on spike timing. > One thing is certain; a new AI model based on spike timing will pop out of nowhere and displace the existing paradigm. Ok this is one thing which admittedly annoys me: is this certain, as in 99.999% probability? And with what time frame? Would the author be willing to enter a bet where I wager $1 and win a billion dollars (since it has positive expected value for a "certain" event)? |
|
Looking at other post the author is either a troll or mentally insane and plans to build fancy perpetual motion machines.
https://medium.com/@RebelScience/the-simple-reason-that-we-a...