[nbadg]

Kyle's a fried of mine, so I may be a bit biased. But I'm very sympathetic to this kind of license, and fairness is really hard to define, especially in advance. He's actually written separately [1] about exactly how difficult it is.

If you really want to have a concrete definition of fairness, you're ultimately going to need to hire a lawyer to make a specific license. That could simply be an add-on clause to this license that explicitly defines "fair" as a term, and I think that's exactly the kind of plug-and-play license language that Kyle has done some work on in other projects.

That all being said, Kyle is generally very welcoming of (respectful!) feedback, and I think given how much time he's spent thinking about how exactly one can define "fairness", he might enjoy some fresh thoughts about it.

[1] https://writing.kemitchell.com/2019/12/02/Correct-Intuitive-...