[irrational]

Personally I would not buy property south of the 45th parallel anymore (in the northern hemisphere). Even north of that we have seen shockingly high temperatures. Anything south of that will become a hellscape within our lifetime.

[quickthrower2]

Maybe the futurist should not hold real estate at all - keep wealth in stocks and rent and let the landlords place their bets on chaos theory.

[galangalalgol]

Latitude will have less impact than altitude from the projections I have seen. Bogota may be less impacted than Anchorage.

[ed_balls]

it depends if it's east or west. Chicago is 42o, similar to Madrid, but I think Madrid will have bigger problems.

[sumedh]

> Personally I would not buy property south of the 45th parallel anymore

Obama bought a property in Martha's Vineyard, why would a former President with all the knowledge about global warming buy it?

[arn]

Cause he’s rich and can afford it regardless what happens. Why would you pay for ice at a convenience store when you could make it yourself at home.

[sumedh]

> Cause he’s rich and can afford it regardless what happens.

I dont think rich people like to lose money.

Would you pay for ice when you know it would already melt when you get it?

[arn]

If I could use it for 20 years first, definitely.

[sumedh]

What happens after 20 years?

[irrational]

Obama will be 80 in 20 years. Maybe OP means he will be close to death so he won’t care about climate change affecting his vacation home.

[trentnix]

Bet.