Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by akersten 1616 days ago
> many terms of service prohibit interacting with their website in an automated fashion,

Ignoring the fact that I didn't agree to anything just by virtue of requesting a page from a webserver (and, your server sent me the data!), that's such a meaningless phrase that it's certainly unenforceable. What is an automated fashion? Do I have to manually craft my HTTP request by hand-pulsing a voltage on an Ethernet cable, or do I have your permission to let Chrome automate that for me?
1 comments
RobSm 1616 days ago
This is so exactly. People do not realize that when they use chrome to view website, chrome is their 'scraper'.

And the goal of webs craping is not to get illegal data, but to have efficiency and performance by not doing something manually but letting computer do the repetitive tasks. It's a productivity tool. You can't make something illegal just because it's an automation instead of 'manual' operation.

link
nsonha 1616 days ago
are you a lawyer? Your opinion doesn't really mean anything if you still lose the case at the end. By your logic there isn't a clear way to define DDoS either. Sounds like there is though?
link
Chris2048 1615 days ago
> there isn't a clear way to define DDoS either

It isn't clear to me that there is. The difference seems to lie in intent.

You could maybe nail a group making many requests without using the data for anything as making many spurious requests and hence having ill-intent, I suppose. Maybe having dedicated servers for such a tasks prove it even more?

link