[greyblake]

> the use of decorators in even the most basic example

Can we agree that JSX is not a valid JS? So decorators are required indeed to simulate "JSX magic"

> no async/await.

As I mentioned, it's not an really an issue (although I though it will be). At least from my experience.

> You can't have two files with the same name in different folders??

This sucks indeed :)

The problem that those 20% corrupt the value of another 80% :/

[MoSattler]

> Can we agree that JSX is not a valid JS?

Neither is rescript - so why not make jsx a first class citizen?

[yawaramin]

JSX is a first-class citizen in ReScript. No decorators required for JSX. Only required for React component function signature.

[greyblake]

Because a programming language is not a template engine.

[scrollaway]

Neither is jsx. It’s just syntactic sugar for some recursive function calls.