|
|
|
|
|
by riyadparvez
1612 days ago
|
|
This is what I've written: > while privately discussed that not only it is a possibility, some of them believed it's *highly probable*. This is what you have written: > proof positive that the author's mind was *absolutely settled* that it was a lab leak Judge for yourself. I am not going to respond to any of your comment on this thread. Peace. |
|
Do you have something about Mike Farzan saying, in public, that it was very unlikely that the lab leak theory was true? Or is it then incorrect to say that individual virologists were saying privately one thing and publicly another?