|
|
|
|
|
by amitpm
1624 days ago
|
|
The article’s arguments can be summarized as two main points - 1. “Death is not the end of your matter, only of your particular consciousness.” To which I say, big whoop. I don’t really care that the carbon atoms in my body go on to be part of another animal, or continue being part of the “universe”. I don’t care that “energy” is eternal - there’s nothing special about energy. “I” start and stop at consciousness, and I see no reason to NOT rage against the dying of that light. 2. Don’t think about death, it’s a thought that isn’t productive. To which I say that is impossible. Even if it were possible, that is sacrificing one’s humanity to be no better than an animal. Reading a bit of Kierkegard may help. |
|
Many are obsessed with the notion of an afterlife and over-prioritize around that possibility. I kind of like the idea that I continue in some form, even if I’m not conscious.
As for “raging against dying”, fair enough. I’m just not sure that such rage will accomplish anything. At this age, I’d rather accept the inevitable and make the most of the time I have.