|
|
|
|
|
by Uchikoma
5396 days ago
|
|
[edit: See my comment below on how this might be a culture thing] I wonder how 15 hours in the post become a couple of days here on HN. But of course, the post was written as an anecdote and should be taken as that. Could you elaborate what makes Akka "a language" for you? I did assume Akka actors are for all practical reasons a drop in replacement for scala actors. More people should btw. read "Anecdotal Evidence and Other Fairy Tales" in Hacknots book: http://www.scribd.com/doc/459372/hacknot-book-a4 |
|
Akka is _not_ a language - I'm not sure where you got that impression? (please explain so I can respond to it - no judgement). Based on the Akka documentation (pre-1.0), it did not seem to be completely a "drop in replacement for scala actors" but I hope it's moving that way (and I'm very pleased that Scala is adopting Akka as the default implementation!).
Heh, yes, anecdotes are meant to be just that....