[tlackemann]

This is why I get paid top dollar as a consultant ;) When a company's top engineers decide to rewrite their stack in JavaScript, I get to swoop in, take $10k and tell them their old PHP monolith was just fine.

Long live idiots, for I'll always get paid

[tacostakohashi]

It's amazing how (much of) 'senior management' is actually just stopping / not letting people doing dumb things. Turns out it's pretty much a full-time job just stopping silly things and keeping entropy at bay.

[a_e_k]

s/senior management/parenting/

It's striking just how much this comment also describes how I feel as a parent sometimes.

[mschuster91]

With a full-on rewrite, it's mostly because said top engineers have realized that their application has grown from tiny humble beginning to a behemoth with stuff bolted on everywhere, remnants of no-longer-used components never been removed and the likes, while their superiors won't ever grant budget for actual software maintenance (e.g. remove old cruft, update that Symfony release or in some extreme case, actually use a framework instead of hand-written router and ORM code) but they would be willing to spend money on a complete rewrite.

What these "top engineers" need is a decent CTO, not people like you who come in and tell them to continue working on a tech stack that they have despised to work with for many months now.

Incompetent upper management will only lead to resignations out of frustration, not to progress.

[tlackemann]

Yes, agreed. But do you know how rare good CTOs are? I do, because I've consulted for more companies without a good one than worked at companies with a good one.

A good CTO is like a good CEO. They have to be involved in the nitty-gritty sometimes. Stepping down and up is a challenge that not many engineers possess.