|
|
|
|
|
by edmcnulty101
1626 days ago
|
|
What's the science behind claiming that conservatives prefer authority over fairness or caring for others? Sounds like unscientific terms used to demonize an large group by choosing favorable characteristics for one group and unfavorable characteristics for another. Conservatives do it also by characterizing liberals as emotional and irrational and bleeding heart and impractical and incompetent furry avocado toast eaters. I don't know how accurate these labels are for large groups of tens of millions of people. Sounds like the kind of thing people want to hear to feel a moral superiority over a group that they differ from, exactly what the article describes. It's like saying all Arabs have terroristic tendencies. I would love to see Book sales of that specific book broken down by political region. |
|
https://www.nyu.edu/about/news-publications/news/2020/novemb...
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/conservative-and-...
That's just a quick sample. I could spam this discussion with links until the cows come home, but I won't. It's pretty well-known stuff really, and it shouldn't even be surprising. Wouldn't it be weird if such differences in priorities didn't exist, or ran contrary to the obvious and deep antipathy between adherents of those two quasi-religions? Maybe some people are uncomfortable with such results placing them in a category inconsistent with their self-image, but that dissonance is best handled via introspection instead of aggression.