The premise of this article is that Intel was intimidated out of mentioning Xinjiang and instead opted to list categories of practices to be excluded from its supply chain.
Why is it not appropriate to discuss the ways Intel and other US companies are already beneficiaries of some of those practices?
The premise of this article is that Intel was intimidated out of mentioning Xinjiang and instead opted to list categories of practices to be excluded from its supply chain. Why is it not appropriate to discuss the ways Intel and other US companies are already beneficiaries of some of those practices?