|
|
|
|
|
by sandworm101
1626 days ago
|
|
The public information is an afterthought. Cameras on plows are a liability thing. Plows often hit things they simply cannot see, stuff covered in snow. But after a collision is is very hard to determine what if anything was under the snow prior to impact. There is no way to really avoid this problem while still plowing. So cameras protect the city/state/driver by showing what things looked like from the driver's perspective. That the streams are shared with the public is a bonus. |
|
My city has two persons in the cab, one is the driver, one is the spotter. The spotter really just calls audibles on the stuff they see.
It's cheaper to hire that spotter than pay the insurance for single operator scenarios.
We can get some heavy snow days, the kind that make everything come to a standstill until things are cleared by these hulking beasts (kudos for naming one plow "hulk"). Having access to this information would be awesome.
Not surprising the home of the motor city would (appear) have their road clearing under control.