Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by keneda7 1627 days ago
So do you disagree with the idea that it is his library?

If you agree that this is his library, do you believe what he did is different than a company changing their public API or deprecating them without any notice?

1 comments

It’s deliberate sabotage and shipped as a routine update. If he’d walked away or made a breaking change in a major release, nobody would expect more.

Similarly, if it was a service everyone understands that those require money to operate but there’s no analogous reason to tell people to upgrade to deliberately broken code.