|
|
|
|
|
by throwawayay02
1624 days ago
|
|
I can tell you you sound very biased. In my own European country most people certaintly do not know what distinction is made by the health authories around "with" versus "from" covid. We also no longer have data on the effects per comorbidity. Broken down per vaccine or if had prior infection. Even speaking of side effects was completely verboten. Everything is kept very nebulous and I believe it is mostly because of incompetence, but also some malice and distrust of the public to handle the truth. So no, any reporting that seeks to puts their feet to the fire and clarify their data is important, and if it gives someone clicks good for them. I want the press to ask questions, not just parrot the media conference. |
|
In this case the actual hospitalizations have been inaccurate, so that very important decisions have been made on inaccurate data.
The real problem in Denmark is the inability to maintain the same hospital capacity as just 12 months ago.
It feels a bit too convenient that the inaccurate numbers support more lockdown and restrictions.
The new and accurate numbers for hospitalizations will hopefully lead to serious reform of the health care system, it is sorely needed.