| Thank you for your reply on all points. On the matter of testing browser exploits etc. it seems to me there's no decent comprehensive list of exploitable browser functions that's easily comprehensible to normal users as well as being easily accessible. I reckon that a link on your homepage to a well organized table etc. that lists browser function names, their description or explanation thereof together with their various exploits (description, modus operandi, notes, links to more info etc.) in an easily readable format would be very worthwhile as would also draw users to your site for that reason alone. When there, they'd also find the browser tests. (There's any amount of stuff on the web about browsers, exploits etc. but I've not seen one that's comprehensive in that it brings all three aspects into one place.) About Tor, I would certainly agreed with you. Bootstrapping with fallback security makes sense. If there's any argument then make it optional at the click of a button, etc. In a way, your test results have acted as a review and I reckon that's a good thing. Frankly, I'm horribly disenchanted with most browsers and we need a site that reviews most of them in an objective and comprehensive way. Perhaps in the future you might consider doing this by reviewing browsers in the light of your tests. |