|
|
|
|
|
|
by Jtsummers
1624 days ago
|
|
|
> It's an interesting math problem, that exists on the contexts of its definitions (like any other). But given that the definitions aren't stated, it's not reasonable to expected people to come aware of them. That's why I linked to the the definitions in my own comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29875085 https://aitopics.org/download/classics:E29CE08E This entire thread is mostly suffering from excessive pedantry because the linked blog failed to properly frame the problem. |
|
|
It is? The comments here don’t seem pretentious and dogmatic to me, I prefer to use pentantry for cases where basically people can tell they’re being a little bit of a dick.
It seems here in the comments people are simply saying, it’s hard to see the contradiction, that they can’t see any contradiction, and I think their implication is not to be a dick, it’s to hope someone will reply and say well here’s how it works or to correct a mistake.
In other words to simply get to the bottom of understanding.