Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by karmakurtisaani 1626 days ago
The analogy is ok if you only consider the capitalist's point of view. Screws don't need health care not do they have children that have to pay for college.

If you want to also consider the worker's point of view, you need think of things like cost of living vs salary and unionizing. Computer part analogies are much too naive for that.

1 comments

I dont think there's anything at all naive by realizing that the capitalists perspective on you is just like how they view a part of a machine they own, and they will treat you according to how you would treat a piece of machine based on how expensive / difficult to replace you/it are.

Sense you seemed to miss the point. Capitalists dont care about you. The dirty secret though is that communists/socialists view you as a cog in a machine too. Every large system will.

Ok, thanks for the clarification. I got the impression that you were arguing for the "capitalist" viewpoint rather than just characterizing it, as that opinion seems to be somewhat popular here. My mistake if that was not the case.

For the record, my intention was to contrast that to the antiwork sentiment, and how it is understandable, if not a direct consequence, starting from the "capitalist" model of thinking about work.