[throw_m239339]

None of these points have any legal standing, from a copyright perspective.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29868199

[mjlawson]

You are technically correct. The best kind of correct! In practical terms, it depends on the license used. Since most licenses used in open source will prevent you from making these kind of requests, this consequence isn't likely to have any practical implications.

[kd5bjo]

You are assuming that the true rights holders of all the code in the package actually agreed to the given license. Someone unrelated to the package development can still claim it includes an illegally-copied, unlicensed version of their code.

[tomrod]

Despite the need to keep it clear, copyright does not reign supreme.

[throw_m239339]

> Despite the need to keep it clear, copyright does not reign supreme.

neither do NPM TOS, or whatever Microsoft thinks they are entitled to, since NPM is owned by Microsoft.

[tomrod]

Which is not what I argued :^)