|
|
|
|
|
by bawolff
1620 days ago
|
|
> The simple reason is, wallet based authentication & authorization is more mainstream than pgp today. So what, the killer feature is its UI isn't as shit as the program world famous for having a shit UI Besides if that is your metric, JWTs are definitely more mainstream than blockchain stuff. >Think of freenode transfer a while ago, if the identity, moderation, ownership of channels, etc data was stored on the blockchain and controlled by the user. The community could migrate to another IRC service which fetched data from the blockchain and each user could get the same account they had on freenode by verifying they owned that data. Kind of hard to have a secret cabal channel if membership is public. Does this mean to ban someone from a channel you need to pay a transaction fee? That sounds fun from a channel op perspective. |
|