Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Wowfunhappy 1615 days ago
Okay, then lets do away with reversible transactions! I would have assumed it was the banks who bore the cost in the majority of cases (which makes sense, since they have the most data to detect fraud and are the ones who are supposed to be doing due diligence), but I don't know enough about this industry.

But, let's do it without a blockchain that wastes massive amounts of carbon.

Edit: Just to be clear, I'm not advocating making transactions permanent. It's an "if this, then that".

1 comments

The current system does protect consumers. Just saying it does not reduce crime. It just shifts who the victim is.