Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by loceng 1622 days ago
This doctor and Stanford professor, Jay Bhattacharya, on Lex Fridman podcast says differently and doesn't mention Remdesivir: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=oIOGUYOPAsA

Another reason why deaths from COVID may be so high, a pulmonary nurse stated in a 30 minute testimony to a government public committee/inquiry, is that they were treating COVID patients differently than any other lung disease related diseases; he believes there's been mass malpractice, he also references Remdesivir; suppress preventative-proactive treatment so people need hospitalization, so then they gain monetary incentive from one or more things - is the developing conspiracy hypothesis. I'll try to lookup on YouTube the testimony I'm speaking of and will edit to add if I find it again.

Another thing that everyone should be up in arms about is questioning just how well/poorly done, and with how much integrity and/or oversight were the clinical trials done with? Watch this 11 minute testimony of Maddie De Garay's mother sharing their story - her 12 year old daughter in wheelchair and needing feeding tube, among other issues, after being in Pfizer's 12-15 year old trial - which I may note they only collected (inaccurate and limited) data for for 7 days post vaccine: https://youtu.be/L2GKPYzL_JQ - more videos of her story out there as well on "fringe" sites; here's another 5 minute video of their experience everyone should watch.

I wish people weren't lazy to downvote instead of asking for a citation or where or why I believe what I said. If you care about the truth then you understand misinformation is real, whether malicious and purposeful or exists through incompetence, if you take an arrogant stance that "your information" is right and that it couldn't actually be misinformation - then you're part of the problem with society today, including ideology and the intellectual and integrity crisis.

1 comments

How do we really disagree? Feds pay extra for Remdesivir deaths. That stuff causes more death than Ebola, yet they got it approved in USA for emergency use. And the shall-not-be-mentioned Ivermectin, which has decades of proven safety, is shunned.

Ventilators have 90% kill rate, and higher in China. The game is to avoid having to vent.

Ivermectin may be "safe" but provides minimal benefit against covid
So some experts claim the Ivermectin clinical trials are poorly done, so based on this testimonial from a mother who's daughter was injured the Pfizer trial for 12-15 year olds - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2GKPYzL_JQ - do you think the Pfizer trial was done well or badly? Do you think the way Pfizer trial was done is more or less disturbing than Ivermectin being promoted? Where's the outrage over this Pfizer situation (and which calls into question the oversight of all of the vaccine trials if this is possible).
Sorry, I don't reply to anecdotes, particularly ones on youtube