Which is different/worse than the current situation where the author is being stolen from without even having the ability to vet their clients the way the intermediary does?
The author is a businessperson who’s job it is to make decisions about how to get paid for their work.
The person in question assuming the story is true as stated is totally uninvolved and innocent and just lost $12,500.
I mean in general if people have payment methods others can use with absolutely no recourse that’s a bad thing. This isn’t a super complicated concept.
The author is a businessperson who’s job it is to make decisions about how to get paid for their work.
The person in question assuming the story is true as stated is totally uninvolved and innocent and just lost $12,500.
I mean in general if people have payment methods others can use with absolutely no recourse that’s a bad thing. This isn’t a super complicated concept.