One of the posters wondered why disruptive billions aren't being made by new printer companies.
Well not that long ago look what happened with disruptive scooter and ebike rental.
Those things piled up faster than landfills could handle it.
With printers billions were already made in the 20th century.
There are so many thousands of tonnes of surplus printers at any one time, a huge percentage of which have not yet been landfilled, that all I use are rescued printers and I'm in a business where the only deliverable product is paperwork.
Even though I am the pioneer of the paperless approach.
Anyway, recently things like the discontinued Brother HL-2270 series are more common as discards but have plenty of life left in the hardware.
When I got one complete with a couple new toner refills, it was a good time to add it to one of my paperless subnets. Printing which had been non-essential could then become discretionary and the actual cost per page would start at zero and stay that way for the remainder of the toner it had plus the two new cartridges. Well actually only zero compared to other printers considering the cost of the paper is the same.
I like this printer better than the equivalent HP's and Lexmark I have kept running in those offices still largely doing full paperwork output for each job.
When Windows 11 was released the Brother website posted a message having a positive outlook for compatible drivers to become available for download within a few weeks.
That did come true and it turned out better than anticipated since it was still just the same drivers that had been validated for Windows 10.
That's the kind of engineering I like.
Now they have a detailed list of all their printers supported for Windows 11 with a highly respectable array of discontinued models going back many years.
With the printer connected to a regular Windows network, wireless or not, you can fire up a Linux workstation and the printer is easily detected, although you may need to select something like USA Letter Size paper if the default is European A4.
Once again I don't recommend actually purchasing a printer when there are so many homeless needing adoption.
Whatever you're printing will look 100% better/more professional if you get someone else to print it using commercial tools.
Printers are cool if you need to quickly print some black-and-white papers in a jiffy. But anything more than that (and even that) is never going to compare to getting it properly printed.
It's like filming video with your phone: it will always pale in comparison to an actual, video-oriented camera.
What if I don't want to go out, or what if I don't care about quality and what I need isn't about quality anyway...just wanting to print an essay on paper that I can use for pen edits?
So what's the point of your commentary in this entire thread at all then? You're lack of need for printing serves no one except yourself in this thread about people and their printing needs/issues.
Because in every case where a person says they "need" to print one can fine a more economical, more environmental, and easier solution to printing.
None of the examples highlighted in the comment I responded to should be required for ANYONE to print, not just me. Electronic versions of each of them are better, more effective, cheaper, and have less environmental impact
That's just not true. You can have your opinion, but you are not in a place to dictate what is best for anyone except yourself. There are many reasons people prefer not reading electronic items.
One example is all of the missing animal posters people hand out and distribute.
Also, QR codes providing quick access to some electronic info is nice, but you still have to print them. Also, random QR codes placed somewhere are not going to get scanned. You must also print other things along side them to give enough info on why someone should scan the code.
I feel like I'm just feeding a troll at this point
Well not that long ago look what happened with disruptive scooter and ebike rental.
Those things piled up faster than landfills could handle it.
With printers billions were already made in the 20th century.
There are so many thousands of tonnes of surplus printers at any one time, a huge percentage of which have not yet been landfilled, that all I use are rescued printers and I'm in a business where the only deliverable product is paperwork.
Even though I am the pioneer of the paperless approach.
Anyway, recently things like the discontinued Brother HL-2270 series are more common as discards but have plenty of life left in the hardware.
When I got one complete with a couple new toner refills, it was a good time to add it to one of my paperless subnets. Printing which had been non-essential could then become discretionary and the actual cost per page would start at zero and stay that way for the remainder of the toner it had plus the two new cartridges. Well actually only zero compared to other printers considering the cost of the paper is the same.
I like this printer better than the equivalent HP's and Lexmark I have kept running in those offices still largely doing full paperwork output for each job.
When Windows 11 was released the Brother website posted a message having a positive outlook for compatible drivers to become available for download within a few weeks.
That did come true and it turned out better than anticipated since it was still just the same drivers that had been validated for Windows 10.
That's the kind of engineering I like.
Now they have a detailed list of all their printers supported for Windows 11 with a highly respectable array of discontinued models going back many years.
With the printer connected to a regular Windows network, wireless or not, you can fire up a Linux workstation and the printer is easily detected, although you may need to select something like USA Letter Size paper if the default is European A4.
Once again I don't recommend actually purchasing a printer when there are so many homeless needing adoption.