[theturtletalks]

I mean decentralization in the "proving ownership" way. Right now, a bank can be the central authority on how much money you have in your account. With Bitcoin, people collectively determine how much each person has through the blockchain. A bank doing it will always be cheaper, but then the bank has too much control. How much are people willing to pay to make sure one entity does not have too much control or power?

[matheusmoreira]

> With Bitcoin, people collectively determine how much each person has through the blockchain.

That's how it was supposed work. The current reality is small highly centralized group of miners maintain the blockchain.

[theturtletalks]

Do you think more miners will join if Bitcoin gains more adoption? Their is a cost to even find out if decentralization (through blockchain) is even worth it.

[matheusmoreira]

How? They can't. My PC, laptop and phone can't mine bitcoin.

The way to achieve true decentralization is ASIC resistant mining algorithms and some form of diminishing returns to force miners to operate at small to medium scales. We need lots and lots of small miners running on commodity hardware that people already own, not a few large scale operations running on expensive custom silicon.

[theturtletalks]

You make some great points. My points were for crypto in general, so do you think a crypto will come that is truly decentralized and can be mined more easily?

[matheusmoreira]

I think Monero is closest to the original cryptocurrency dream. Not perfect but closest. It has ASIC resistant algorithms to make mining with normal CPUs feasible.