[thinkingemote]

Every "free speech" website has lots of moderation. But the moderation is hard to spot when users are anonymous or admin actions are hidden.

People shouldn't confuse an ideological stance with an operational strategy.

[shadowfox]

I may be confused by what you are saying. What is the point of a company having an ideological stance if "free speech", if they are violating that all the time by censoring? How is that different from paying lip service to free speech like many companies?