[bahador]

You did nothing wrong. No need to apologize.

[fake-name]

Using a site generation framework that requires JS to render static text is doing something wrong.

[kyawzazaw]

It is a student making an easy blog. Chill out.

[exdsq]

Exactly right

[bahador]

This is what I meant by "dangerous".

Static sites can do more than render text. Even collapsing comments on HN doesn't work with JavaScript disabled.

[Arnavion]

Rendering the primary text content and being able to collapse comments are not on the same level of functionality.

(Though for this particular website, I can see the text just fine with JS disabled in firefox, so I'm not sure why it doesn't work for CaliforniaKarl.)

[FabHK]

> Even collapsing comments on HN doesn't work with JavaScript disabled.

But everything else pretty much does. HN is nice in that one can read it (and comment) without JS.

[erik_seaberg]

https://www.gatsbyjs.com/docs/reference/rendering-options/se... says they support HTML, though some of their own docs like https://www.gatsbyjs.com/pricing/ and https://www.gatsbyjs.com/dashboard/signup are broken.

[skeeter2020]

you get to vote with your eyes and attention; if you truly want to advance your position come up with a better approach to convincing the rest of us.

If your comment was a drive-by sniping that made you feel good and has by now left your attention, mission accomplished.