|
|
|
|
|
by bill_from_tampa
1630 days ago
|
|
I'm the same age as OP's mother (69, will be 70 in July) and I've been using linux on the desktop since 1997 (24 years ago). Windows 97/98 was so flaky and crash-prone that I did a search for some other OS for my Compaq desktop after being connected to a neighborhood cable modem from Roadrunner. I read about Unix and the commercial trademark fights, and then came across info on Linux on Yahoo. It seemed promising and I found a Red Hat boxed version in my local CompUSA in Florida - I used a different commercial boot-loader and kept windows and Red Hat on my computer - it was great! Linux (in 1997) was a bit clunky and stiff but it was reliable and programs could run overnight or for days and not crash - unlike my experience in Windows. I've kept some version of Linux in a dual-boot configuration ever since (Red Hat, Suse, Mandrake, Ubuntu, Debian sid, and for 10 years Debian testing). I've never been able to find native Linux tax programs so have needed to boot into Windows each tax season - but this year I may use a cloud/online tax service, so after 24 years I may be able to nuke the windows partition and use it for additional ext4 storage. But I'll wait till after my taxes are filed this year to see how things go - I'm a bit conservative! |
|
The only reason I still have a dual boot is for video games now. But once I can afford a new graphics card, I'll keep my current one in the secondary PCIe slot, and pass it through to a virtual machine so it's basically native performance, and I will no longer dual boot.