|
|
|
|
|
by dljones
1628 days ago
|
|
Neither one of those hypotheses accounts for the four weirdnesses described in the article. So they don't seem like very good hypotheses. Similarly "it came from an animal" that we've never found two years later is not a hypothesis that accounts for the information we have about the first COVID-19 outbreak either. To me that sounds very much like OJ vowing to find the real killer, but somehow he never did. |
|