[q1w2]

Again - we are judging him on an email he sent. ...yet that email is nowhere. All we have is the media's impressions of an email they have not released.

Your links ALSO do not disclose the original email this is all about.

I'm not going to judge this guy without the actual evidence. I feel like I'm taking crazy pills being the only one in this thread demanding to see the evidence against him.

[zenexer]

1. The first link contains, at minimum, a significant portion of the original email.

2. The individual in question has resigned without releasing the full email.

3. The individual's statement on the matter is nearly as bad as the portion of the email we've seen.

4. The second link shows a pattern of similar behavior.

> I'm not going to judge this guy without the actual evidence.

There appears to be a treasure trove of evidence against this individual, and no attempt has been made by anyone to dispute it. It's rare that we get this much evidence. If you really want the full email, just ask the people who received it--they sound as though they're eager to hand it to anyone who's interested.