|
|
|
|
|
by gumby
1629 days ago
|
|
I suspect I would have felt differently had she jumped there first à la Steve Jobs. She only ended up down the homeopathic pathway when other alternatives had been exhausted and on that basis I am glad it was available to her and consider it a good thing. |
|
He only refused surgery and not modern medicine. He even had an under the radar liver transplant(probably jumped the queue and hence the article mentions ‘under the radar’ https://www.forbes.com/sites/alicegwalton/2011/10/24/steve-j... )I doubt if he opted for homeopathy(and homeopathy doesn’t claim to cure cancer or congenital issues that require surgery. It only treats symptoms.)
[..] Jobs’ cancer had been discovered by chance during a CT scan in 2003 to look for kidney stones, during which doctors saw a “shadow” on his pancreas. Isaacson told CBS’ 60 Minutes last night that while the news was not good, the upside was that the form of pancreatic cancer from which Jobs suffered (a neuroendocrine islet tumor) was one of the 5% or so that are slow growing and most likely to be cured.[..]
The article also said that he waited 9 months for the surgery instead of immediately as it was thought to be a slow growing cancer and he was reluctant to be ‘cut open’. How many people with pancreatic cancer like Steve Jobs had survived as long as he did..now that’s a data point.