Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by reactspa 1626 days ago
> in his model, the 223-tooth gear turned much too fast for it to make sense. But in my model, the 223-tooth gear rotates very slowly

Science!

(Clarification: it all sounds very narrative-fallacy to me. Hey, but feel free to downvote the opinion of a contrarian!)

2 comments

I think the downvotes are because you are making a very low effort criticism (even with your clarification). If you expand a bit on why it sounds "narrative-fallacy" to you, you might get more traction.
I am sure he mention the engaging a 38 tooth gear that meant a 19 year cycle was done at half the speed first thought was needed.