|
|
|
|
|
by maccard
1631 days ago
|
|
> There are some exceptions among talented and well-educated developers who seem like it, I know, but those seem to be exceptions. I have to disagree with this (but agree with the rest of your post). The issues with go are there, but it's still a robust language with great tooling, a solid underlying ecosystem, and is actively improving. It performs pretty well, and idiomatic go is mostly transferable across projects (as opposed to say c++ where you have to pick your favourite style guide). I think it's a great tool for developers, even given its shortcomings |
|