|
|
|
|
|
|
by 908B64B197
1630 days ago
|
|
|
> If the CBC was the "propaganda arm" of the Liberal party, it would follow that they were be extremely negative towards the NDP and the Green party These two account for virtually nothing (unless I'm missinterpreting how seat allocation works up north). They aren't a threat. > But, of course, that's not what happens. Why does that not happen? Because they're not a "propaganda arm" for the Liberal party You seem to believe you have better information and political skills than their paid staff. That's a bold statement. > but if any of them were in a meeting where it was discussed how to elect the Liberals in the next election, they would walk out on the spot. The idea that that happens is purely a Conservative fantasy. I have no doubts that your friends aren't invited to these meetings. It's happening behind closed doors way above their paygrade. |
|
|
With the utmost respect, I think an elementary understanding of multi-party democracies would be a useful first step for this discussion.
It may be instructive to look at some of the key Canadian swing ridings:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richmond_Hill_(electoral_distr... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitchener%E2%80%94Conestoga#El... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_Moody%E2%80%94Coquitlam#E... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pitt_Meadows%E2%80%94Maple_Rid...
There's a reason that Canadian Conservatives have fought tooth-and-nail against any type of ranked-choice voting system. I genuinely believe that the Conservatives would not win another election in my lifetime in a ranked-choice system.