[PradeetPatel]

>...his tormentors will never have to answer to it.

Why the defeatist attitude? It has been established that the truth will eventually surface with sufficient education, public awareness and time. When the truth is out, justice will follow. The world does not operate on a "might is right" model.

[Cpoll]

> The world does not operate on a "might is right" model.

I'd hate to be the cynic in the room, but the actions of various powerful countries has show the opposite.

In general, it seems like if the truth does surface, it's met with general ambivalence and nothing much happens to anyone involved. I'll cop out on concrete examples and just say that I find them too numerous and depressing.

[pydry]

>The world does not operate on a "might is right" model.

If it didnt then Prince Andrew would probably be behind bars and Assange would be free.

[sennight]

Addressing this feels like how I imagine it would feel to drop a cinderblock on a box of kittens...

> It has been established that the truth will eventually surface with sufficient education, public awareness and time.

Not really, but even in the case where it might be partially true - it would definitely be a non-linear function of time. By that I mean the immediate dispersion of true information would be zero, the mid-point would be the max, and then there would be a long tail of disinformation. The winners write the history, and the historians present the stories based on some criteria - and you can be sure that it isn't objective. Have you ever noticed the way that philosophical teachings, the ones going back thousands of years, all promote some kind of social stratification that favors a ruling class? Plato's Republic being an easy example. Ever wonder why? Hint: it isn't because it reflects some emergent quality of the human condition.

> The world does not operate on a "might is right" model.

Unfortunately it absolutely does, or at least has - forever. I'm pretty confident this is the reason why the common theme for religion is the concept of balancing force that is dependent on faith alone. A universal karma, an afterlife. If justice were the rule of the day then these things wouldn't be needed.

The only thing I see potentially changing any of this is solidly rooted in the cryptoanarchy sphere - because misrepresented math simply doesn't function, halting the propagation of corrupting influence in a way no other system can.