|
|
|
|
|
|
by andreilys
1629 days ago
|
|
|
Usefulness and helpfulness are far better metrics, and such a high false positive rate is clearly causing issues in respect to those How exactly do you plan on codifying usefulness and helpfulness? A high false positive rate is not necessarily a bad thing and may instead be the catalyst for additional tests to confirm the first one.
The tests accuracy may actually be 100%, which is great because it avoids a child being born with a fatal genetic disease. Would you prefer a high false negative rate that misses these diseases instead? |
|
|