Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by zapataband1 1633 days ago
These business space missions are using 60 year old propulsion technology and it's pretty easy to figure out the math that shows that a fuel tank the size of the planet cannot take you to any other habitable planet. Scientists -know- that the best way to learn about space and the universe at this point is to build huge telescopes. For profit companies will not save us.
1 comments

No amount of telescopes will provide the off-world low-g manufacturing capabilities necessary to build the logistics we need.

The moon is both low-g and has wonderful built-in radiation shielding (one of our biggest current blockers) via the simple process of going underground.

I don't think you or I are qualified to make absolute statements about the involvement of for-profit companies in that.

You have not explained your plan on getting off of this planet but you're talking to me about logistics on the moon? No we don't need logistics on the moon. We don't need Elon musks dumb vanity missions to mars. No, we as a society do not need to continue pouring our scarce resources so that scifi-cultists and some rich white assholes can pretend like they can get out of here alive.

A rat done bit my sister Nell. (with Whitey on the moon) Her face and arms began to swell. (and Whitey's on the moon) I can't pay no doctor bill. (but Whitey's on the moon) Ten years from now I'll be payin' still. (while Whitey's on the moon)