While I understand the borrow concept, I can't see how it is useful here. Returns come from your doing something, not from not doing something. Deciding what actions would bring best returns is the essence of planning. What's special about tech debt in this picture, vs for example product features you delay for few cycles later?
Even the code you're proud of is going to need a maintenance lifecycle. If you don't maintain that debt, it compounds to the point you cannot.
Debt is a useful concept because almost every business person understands the risks, but most successful people will borrow anyways.
Where the analogy fails is because we pretend like "if only we pay all the tech debt down everything will be fine". Basically our problem is we think the concept doesn't apply to tech we like.