The remediation started in 1997, and ended in 2006, so I'm not sure how it could have lasted an extra decade given that it didn't last an entire decade total. And that was using only $7B of the original estimate of $35B.
There's not an increased rate of cancer around the area. People have lived in this area for a long time. My neighborhood is upwind not downwind. There's no increased cancer cluster anywhere downwind of the site.
The data should be driving these decisions instead of the paranoia of anti-nuke idiots.
The data should be driving these decisions instead of the paranoia of anti-nuke idiots.