|
|
|
|
|
by longstation
1630 days ago
|
|
My guess is probably the QuickJS has less resource usage compared to the more performant V8. UPDATE:
Now I have read the linked article, here is the reasons (copied from the article): API and integration principles are close to what TIScript uses – it took me just 1 month to add QuickJS to Sciter core. And 4 months more to expose HTML/CSS runtime to JS. Relatively compact implementation – QuickJS is slightly more fatty (by 100 kb) but still in acceptable range. For the note: full version of V8 is about 40 mb – 5 times larger than Sciter itself; Liberal MIT license. Sciter cannot use GPL/LGPL code – many customers expressed this requirement; Readable source code. Well… almost readable. |
|