|
|
|
|
|
|
by _aavaa_
1637 days ago
|
|
|
I did not miss that. But it's harder for me to read that as a technical statement and not more PR after the rest of the PR. I also agree with you about the 100% confidence about not being compromised. Perhaps my previous statement was too black/white. I don't want PR or placating statements, I want a transparent status report without weasel words and which exhaustively covered the different cases (e.g. SOME of the messages were sent in error. what about the rest? Are the rest routine compromises that happen normally? Or was there a spike in compromised accounts?) |
|
|