|
|
|
|
|
|
by GeoAtreides
1635 days ago
|
|
|
>Its not good satire because its very heavy handed ah, yes, such blunt and heavy handed satire compared with old, subtle satire, like that one, modest, pamphlet advocating for eating poor children. not sure why satire needs to be subtle to be good. It can go from crass to oscar-wilde-subtle, as long as it's funny and based on reality I would call it good. |
|
|