[KennyBlanken]

My main reservation with the USPS becoming an ISP lies in its investigative powers and long history of politically driven, unconstitutional use of its police force. Namely suppressing socialist newsletters, pornography, and the like.

I'm guessing most Americans do not realize that going back more than a decade, the USPS has scanned and stored imagery and metadata for every single piece of mail that passes through their automated sorting machines.

Look closely at the images they email you of mail coming into your mailbox and you'll notice that very often, the scans reveal the nature of the documents inside even without messing with contrast/levels.

[derbOac]

That's a good point, and I share that concern to some extent. But in thinking about it I guess I'm of the impression this happens anyway with private ISPs and the government? Private courts, state privilege, etc. Maybe if it were through the USPS it would force some transparency as well due to it not being private.

Also, I would be concerned if all the private ISPs disappeared also. Ideally I'd like to see something like is the case with physical delivery, where you have the USPS, FexEx, UPS, DHL, etc. Having the USPS be an ISP of sorts would hopefully not kill private offerings, along the same lines. Especially so given that we're in a de facto monopoly situation at the level of specific geographic locations often now. Introducing competition where the market has failed to do so shouldn't be a problem, and if it is, there are larger issues.

If anything I could see this being selling point for private ISPs, "use us and don't worry about the government because we have everything locked down in X, Y, and Z manner."