Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by eMGm4D0zgUAVXc7 1639 days ago
If you had to be constantly followed by security people the whole day, would your complete loss of privacy be alleviated by them being cheap?

Include in the equation that Satoshi additionally likely is a person who puts a high value on privacy, given that they ensured to be anonymous up to now.

1 comments

I think you misinterpreted the meaning of my comments. $339k is a bargain for Berkshire (or whoever pays it) considering who they're protecting. That's all.