[armatav]

"Miracle drug" is a sidelining attempt to dismiss infusion therapy, your primary concern in your post is the patient's health - with recommendations to maintain discipline, which is usually done through a focused, repeated and consistent healthy activity - like running, or weightlifting - known positive recreational activities.

Since your concern is for the patients health, and your recommendation is against the use of first line infusion therapy, and your alternative is a known positive recreational activity with the intent to build discipline; it is implied that you believe the infusion is not safe for the patients health in the particular circumstance of short-term sadness.

You are not debating the fact, you are simply dismissing the efficacy of the infusion with regard to assisting patients undergoing "short-term sadness", and working around it when confronted.

The mistake here is somehow believing that all patients can handle "short-term sadness" without undergoing a mental break; it is analytically correct to assault the issue on all available fronts, and if a small infusion dose assists someone in rectifying their issues, it should be done.

The patients perception of their mental state becomes their mental state, which is why psychedelic drugs have such a high efficacy in the first place, the BDNF literally rewires their brain and how they view their issues. So what exactly is implied when you say "Can't wait for regular people that have a few solvable issues in their life but perceive themselves as "depressed" to just take a shortcut where Ketamine, or whatever is the miracle drug at the moment, will fix everything." - these issues are perhaps solvable for you because you would view it how you view their "short-term sadness". This is not the case, each patient is N = 1.