Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by mam4 1638 days ago
Well basically if you are going to make people pay for a photo storage website with a good visualization but somewhat shitty upload system they are just going to flee to a "general file storage" cloud for the same price with a 'slightly shittier' way of viewing them, such as drive or onedrive.

(Especially if you threaten to delete already existing photos)

Source: i moved to onerive in 2019

1 comments

I just took a look at Onedrive. 1TB for $60/year. Flickr is unlimited for $72/yr, and has an API and other conveniences specialized to images.

> onedrive

6T for 99 dollars with family pack. More than necessary

And its not only images. Images are 20% of my cloud only

So you agree that “same price” is incorrect. But, true of course, Flickr is just for photographs.
Yeah. How many of us did not care for mucv than free storage ? Probably the 50% mentionned ib the article