I'm not disputing that the policy is real. I'm saying there's a possibility that the engineer's disdainful reaction to the policy is fake -- and done to stoke outrage and promote the gossip site.
> Why [not name the source]?
Because my intuition is that there's a high probability of this being a viral stunt -- in which case, I'd rather this site not exist.
> Why [not name the source]?
Because my intuition is that there's a high probability of this being a viral stunt -- in which case, I'd rather this site not exist.