Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Arathorn 1639 days ago
> As j. b. crawford notes, the prospect for another federated, Internet wide communication system seem very remote at this point in time, so email is it.

I really don’t think this is true, and is defeatist at best. SIP and XMPP both had a good shot at creating a federated Internet-wide communication system, and we are doing our best to build one with Matrix or die trying.

3 comments

A short message instant messaging system can not replace a long message offline capable system like email. They are fundamentally different things.

The achievable security is significantly higher for an offline capable medium for example:

* https://articles.59.ca/doku.php?id=em:emailvsim

It is clear to me at least that we are stuck with at least 2 problems here. I have wondered if you could at least generalize the two modes in a way that would allow you to have one client and let the user decide.

Both Matrix and XMPP can be used as instant messengers and asynchronous long-form messengers. They both have asynchronous encryption, and have had it for years now.
What's wrong with XMPP except Google decided to shut their instance down?
Nothing. XMPP has an active community, mature servers for every kind of deployment, and many clients under active development for a range of platforms.

My personal focus within the community these days is with improving the ecosystem UX through initiatives like https://docs.modernxmpp.org/

You can follow XMPP development via the community newsletter (email or RSS): https://xmpp.org/newsletter/

Matrix is crap, though, and doesn't solve any new problems.